Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Semergen ; 44 Suppl 1: 10-17, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30322468

RESUMO

New drugs have been added to the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. These drugs have represented an advance in the physiopathological approach to the disease, with the possibility of acting on the different mechanisms involved in raised blood glucose levels and allowing treatment to be individualised, as recommended in clinical practice guide-lines and consensus documents. The incretins were added to the therapeutic arsenal of diabetes in 2006. This group in-cludes glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor antagonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (marketed in Spain in 2007), which act on the incretin system in the gut, reducing glycae-mia, with a decreasing or neutral effect on weight and with a low risk of hypoglycaemic episodes. Their introduction coincided with the publication of the controversial results of studies on intensive glycemic control, leading the Food and Drug Administration (2008) to require demonstration of the cardiovascular safety of new glucose-lowering drugs. The publication of subsequent studies has demonstrated cardiovascular safety and some have shown cardiovascular and survival benefits. These results are modifying the recommenda-tions of the clinical practice guidelines and consensus documents on the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The present article describes the main pharmacological and cardiovascular characteristics of the safety and tolerability of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, which need to be known and updated in primary care, given their wide prescription and the need for correct use of drug therapy in type 2 diabetes.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/administração & dosagem , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatologia , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/farmacologia , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Hipoglicemiantes/farmacologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde
2.
Semergen ; 40(5): 261-73, 2014.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24882393

RESUMO

Diabetes increases the risk of both microvascular and macrovascular complications. Although reducing plasma glucose levels to recommended targets decreases the risk of microvascular outcomes, the effects of anti-diabetic drugs on macrovascular complications and cardiovascular death are of concern. In fact, it has been suggested that some anti-diabetic agents could even be harmful for cardiovascular outcomes. In this context, several health care regulatory agencies have established the need for performing clinical trials specifically designed to assess the cardiovascular safety of anti-diabetic drugs. The results of 2 clinical trials have recently been published that provide important information on the cardiovascular safety of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. The aim of this document was to review the available evidence on the cardiovascular safety of non-insulin anti-diabetic drugs and provide practical recommendations on their use in this context.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/efeitos adversos , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico
3.
Medwave ; 12(2)feb. 2012. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-714147

RESUMO

Objetivo: Determinar la relación costo efectividad incremental del agregado de saxagliptina o sulfonilureas en Colombia a personas con DMT2 que no logran alcanzar metas glucémicas con metformina, durante un período máximo de 20 años. Metodología: Se realizó un estudio de costo efectividad, utilizando un modelo de simulación de eventos discretos con incremento de tiempo fijo (Diabetes Cardiff Model). Las características de la cohorte de pacientes y el perfil de eficacia para cada tratamiento se obtuvieron de la literatura. El costo de los medicamentos se obtuvo de SISMED y Farmaprecios. Los costos de los eventos macro y microvasculares se basaron en el POS, Manual Tarifario SOAT y consulta con experto local. La tasa de descuento en costos y beneficios fue 3,5 por ciento. Resultados: En el grupo tratado con saxagliptina registramos menos eventos fatales y no fatales y menos episodios de hipoglucemia. En ambas estrategias los mayores costos correspondieron a los medicamentos, seguidos por los asociados al tratamiento del infarto de miocardio. El costo incremental de la terapia con saxagliptina fue de US$ 555.552 a 20 años. El tratamiento con saxagliptina redundó en un mayor número de Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad (AVAC) y Años de Vida Ganados (AVG), respecto al obtenido con sulfonilureas. El costo por AVAC fue de US$ 2.190. Los resultados de costo efectividad fueron robustos al análisis de sensibilidad. Conclusión: El agregado de saxagliptina a pacientes que no logran un control glucémico adecuado con metformina, es muy costo efectiva comparada con el agregado de sulfonilureas.


Objective: To determine in Colombia, the cost effectiveness ratio of the saxagliptin or sulphonylureas addition to patients with T2DM who fail to achieve glycemic goals with metformin, for a maximum period of 20 years. Methods: We performed a cost effectiveness analysis, using a discrete event simulation model with fixed time step (Cardiff Diabetes Model). The characteristics of the cohort of patients and efficacy profile for each treatment were obtained from the literature. The cost of medication was obtained from SISMED and Farmaprecios. The costs of macro and microvascular events were based on POS tariffs, SOAT Manual and consultation with local expert. The discount rate on costs and benefits was 3.5 percent. Results: The group treated with saxagliptin had fewer fatal and nonfatal events and fewer episodes of hypoglycemia than the one with sulfonylureas. In both strategies the higher cost corresponds to the drugs, followed by those associated with the treatment of myocardial infarction. The incremental cost of saxagliptin therapy was US$ 555.552 to 20 years. Saxagliptin treatment resulted in a greater number of quality-adjusted life year (QALYs) and life-years gained (LYG) than that obtained with sulfonylureas. The cost per QALY was US$ 2,190. Cost-effectiveness results were robust to sensitivity analysis. Conclusion: Addition of saxagliptin to patients who do not achieve adequate glycemic control with metformin, is highly cost-effective compared with the addition of sulphonylureas.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , /tratamento farmacológico , Dipeptídeos/economia , Dipeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/economia , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/uso terapêutico , Adamantano/análogos & derivados , Colômbia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Quimioterapia Combinada , /economia , Farmacoeconomia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , América Latina , Metformina/uso terapêutico , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...